Archive for February, 2008
Where Catholic Priests Get Their Morality

Do NOT Turn Jesus On1
Now we know what they mean by “Jesus is the light of the world”.
- Creative Commons http://flickr.com/photos/sepultura/2282088722/ [↩]
1 comment
Freedom from Being Offended? F*** You.
Its been about a year since Danish newspapers (and subsequently others around the world) published some cartoons poking fun and the religion of Islam. We all know the story: outcry, censorship, violence, destruction, etc.
This week, many newspapers republished the cartoons (posted below) in response to a foiled attempt to murder the cartoonist1 . Many people claim that such cartoons are hateful and discriminatory. Check a dictionary (or better yet, the koran). They are merely descriptive.
What’s the difference between description and discrimination? Well, discrimination targets people. You might hate country music, but that doesn’t mean you discriminate against country singers. Similarly, these cartoons are not examples of discrimination, they are comments on the tenets of Islam. They do not advocate harming Muslims or hatred against any Muslim - what a ludicrous conclusion. You do not have a right NOT to be offended.
Or perhaps I have the right to kill anyone that challenges my Atheism, musical taste, or gawky posture. Any religious person that claims I deserve to suffer in hell because my beliefs should be murdered or imprisoned. That is hatred; that is musical non-religious bigotry of the highest order. Welcome to my struggle2 .
I don’t hate Muslims, Christians, or even Scientologists. But I do think they are completely ridiculous. The peopl…err…ideas I mean. So what? If you are so incredibly insecure about your beliefs that you have kill anyone that criticizes you, why maintain your beliefs? You people hold the truth don’t you…
Anyhow, here’s the original cartoons (plus a couple extras) for your hateful pleasure.
- Danish papers republish Prophet cartoon. Reuters UK. 13 February 2008. [↩]
- English for ‘Jihad‘ [↩]
2 comments
Defending Your Marijuana Views: The Politically Correct Way
All too often, the case in defense of marijuana is tainted by prejudice, stupidity, and incoherence. In the spirit of political jargon, here’s how to defend your beliefs with more sophisticated wordplay.
Lesson 1 - Deflecting the issue
Q: You think marijuana should be legal? What are you, some kind of pothead?
A: I’ll tell you what I am. I am a firm believer in the philosophical notions of liberty and truth (this might throw off your opponent beyond recovery already). I therefore reject the continuation of a policy that stands in firm contradiction to those notions.
Lesson 2 - Give a little, Take a lot
Q: The truth is that marijuana is a dangerous substance. It causes respiratory illness, psychosis, memory loss, and other problems. How can you possibly call yourself a believer in the truth and deny these facts?
A: I’ll pretend for a moment, that your ‘facts’ are not grossly over-exaggerated and that the scientific support is unquestionable. The truth is that most of these claims are much different than the original reasons for criminalizing marijuana. The lies that it is toxic, creates murderers & heroine addicts, and that it causes permanent psychosis for all users - have long been proven false. If the original reasons for criminalizing it have proven false, there is no longer reason for it to remain criminal.1 234
Lesson 3 - Flipping the Issue; Go on the attack
A: These NEW claims you speak of, pale in comparison to the originals. Should we really ban anything that might increase the risk of common ailments? Should you be put in jail for eating cholesterol?
Lesson 4 - Hardcore logic for weak associations
Q: But marijuana use leads to harder drugs and profits go towards organized crime. How can you possibly support such results?
A: Profits go to organized crime because well, its a crime. If it weren’t a crime, its profits would go elsewhere. Similarly, heroine is a crime. Those people that get heavily involved in marijuana are more likely to get involved with heroine because, the same organized criminals are distributing it. Therefore, marijuana criminalization causes heroine use, not marijuana itself.
Lesson 5 - When all else fails, lie…well
Q: My daughter got into marijuana when she was 16. Today, she’s a crack addict prostituting herself for spare change. Its people like you that allow such things to continue. How do you live with yourself?
A: My grandfather was in the military. He smoked marijuana on a daily basis in order to cope with the stress and trauma, as did many of his fellow soldiers. Without marijuana, the allies would have struggled to defeat the German’s in World War II. I think a world where your daughter is a crack addicted prostitute is more pleasant than a world where each of us is in a slave camp, mutated by genetic experimentation. Don’t you?
- You can also suggest that marijuana has medical applications. Here’s some references to get you started: [↩]
- “We conclude that this CBM [cannabis-based medicine] may represent a useful new agent for treatment of the symptomatic relief of spasticity in MS.” -Christine Collin, MD, et al. “Randomized Controlled Trial of Cannabis-Based Medicine in Spasticity Caused by Multiple Sclerosis”. European Journal of Neurology. Vol. 14, No. 3, Page 290. Mar. 2007. [↩]
- ”Smoked cannabis was well tolerated and effectively relieved chronic neuropathic pain from HIV-associated sensory neuropathy The findings are comparable to oral drugs used for chronic neuropathic pain.” -Donald I. Abrams, MD et al. “Cannabis in Painful HIV-Associated Sensory Neuropathy: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial”. Neurology. Vol. 68, Pages 515-521. Feb. 2007. [↩]
- “Treatment with cannabinoids had been shown to reduce the invasiveness of cancer cells, but the cellular mechanisms underlying this effect were unclear.” -Burkhard Hinz, PhD, et. al. “Inhibition of Cancer Cell Invasion by Cannabinoids via Increased Expression of Tissue Inhibitor of Matrix Metalloproteinases-1″. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Vol. 100, Number 1, Page 51. Dec. 25, 2007. [↩]
10 comments
Why Scientology? Why? we are anonymous, free, For now.

Scientology Pamphlet1
Protest the Church of Scientology? Why not.
Anonymous or not, online oganizers decided to change the news, focus on a powerful organization, and show distaste for it. The nice thing about action: you don’t have to worry about libel or hate speech. It’s curious vocalized criticism of doctors, pharmacists, or homosexuals2 doesn’t qualify as hatred/discrimination (But thats another issue).
For weeks anonymous videos have been threatening the church and organizing a modern media crusade. Some people went further, sending fake anthrax letters to Churches in Los Angeles3 .
Why you ask?
It definitely isn’t due to fraudulent and criminal activities, secrecy, destructive beliefs or opportunistic emotional brainwashing. So what then? Why the anger?
Maybe people in their 20’s just have nothing better to do with their time. They need some senseless, random, cause. There just aren’t enough causes for concern to keep us occupied. We crave senseless discrimination. We are legion.
I am what? Babling? No. I am fair and balanced - scientific even. I told you the what, but what about the why?
Why not? Get up off your as this Sunday. Forget about your exams, work, mass?, or hangover nursing for a day. Embrace the opportunity. Save your political passivity for Monday. Drop some acid with your MAOI’s and Ritalin while smoking a joint outside Scientology headquarters; just cause that’s your right4 . Do what’s right.5
- Creative Commons http://www.flickr.com/photos/groovymother/527216967/sizes/m/ [↩]
- Just threw this one out there, not that its necessarily Scientology related [↩]
- Mailings to Scientology sites probed. L.A. Times. 31 January 2008. [↩]
- To find a location nearest you click here [↩]
- Not Wendy’s [↩]
2 comments


(2 votes, average: 3.5 out of 5)



